Actual Preferences, Actual People

Utilitas 3 (1):113-119 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Maximizing want-satisfactionper seis a relatively unattractive aspiration, for it seems to assume that wants are somehow disembodied entities with independent moral claims all of their own. Actually, of course, they are possessed by particular people. What preference-utilitarians should be concerned with is how people's lives go—the fulfilment of their projects and the satisfaction of their desires. In an old-fashioned way of talking, it ishappy peoplerather thanhappiness per sethat utilitarians should be striving to produce.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,748

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-30

Downloads
102 (#217,222)

6 months
9 (#409,698)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Goodin
Australian National University

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1984 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
Why We Should Reject S.Derek Parfit - 1984 - In Reasons and Persons. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Philosophical Explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Mind 93 (371):450-455.
Responsibility for self.Charles Taylor - 1976 - In Amélie Rorty, The Identities of Persons. University of California Press. pp. 281--99.
Xii Responsibility for Self.Charles Taylor - 1976 - In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty, Identities of Persons. University of California Press. pp. 281-300.

View all 7 references / Add more references