David Egan
Hunter College
This paper assesses Grice’s work on conversational implicature in the light of one of its early targets: Austin’s claim that we cannot isolate the meaning of an expression from the context in which it is used. Grice argues that we can separate the literal meaning of many utterances from their pragmatic implicatures through the mechanism of explicit cancellation. However, Grice’s conception of cancellation does not account for the fact that an explicit cancellation must be uttered, and that its utterance involves further implicatures that undermine the attempted cancellation. What Grice calls explicit cancellations are better understood as utterances that resolve ambiguities, and hence apply only in cases where there exists an ambiguity that needs resolving. If Grice’s work does not undermine Austin, we are in a position to reassess an Austinian form of philosophical criticism that emphasizes the ordinary usage of expressions deployed in philosophical arguments.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1515/agph-2018-4004
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,657
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Conversational Implicatures and Cancellability.Steffen Borge - 2009 - Acta Analytica 24 (2):149-154.
Entailments Are Cancellable.Alex Davies - 2017 - Ratio 30 (3):288-304.
Can Entailments Be Implicatures?Andrei Moldovan - 2019 - In Piotr Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Philosophical Insights into Pragmatics. De Gruyter. pp. 43-62.
Do Conversational Implicatures Explain Substitutivity Failures?Cara Spencer - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (1):126–139.
Speaker’s Meaning and Non-Cancellability.Guangwu Feng - 2013 - Pragmatics and Cognition 21 (1):117-138.
a la Grice & a la Austin. Zur Einheit illokutionarer Akte.Klaus Petrus - 2003 - In Andreas Bächli & Klaus Petrus (eds.), Monism. Ontos. pp. 9--315.
Book Reviews. [REVIEW]Angus Ross - 1989 - Mind 98 (392):649-652.
Austin Vs. Grice.K. Petrus - 2001 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 6:21-43.
Austin a Grice. O Założeniach Analizy Religijnych Czynności Mowy.Klaus Petrus - 2001 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 6:43-46.


Added to PP index

Total views
32 ( #345,944 of 2,462,352 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #299,176 of 2,462,352 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes