Philosophical Quarterly 59 (234):132-137 (2009)

Authors
David Efird
PhD: Oxford University; Last affiliation: University of York
Abstract
Ross Cameron charges the subtraction argument for metaphysical nihilism with equivocation: each premise is plausible only under different interpretations of 'concrete'. This charge is ungrounded; the argument is both valid and supported by basic modal intuitions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2008.588.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,959
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Continuity as a Guide to Possibility.Joshua Rasmussen - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (3):525-538.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
95 ( #122,819 of 2,504,809 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,030 of 2,504,809 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes