Why didn’t The Egoist sell? A response to Yale Modernism Lab, and a note to PhilPapers

Abstract

A researcher at the Yale Modernism Lab, Elyse Graham, raises the question of why the early twentieth century literary review The Egoist had such troubling selling, despite its stellar contributors. She puts the blame on regulars Dora Marsden and Richard Aldington. I offer an alternative hypothesis.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Priestley's polemic against Reid: An additional note.Alan Sell - 1983 - Enlightenment and Dissent 2:121-121.
The Myth of Modernism and Twentieth Century Literature (review).D. D. Todd - 1987 - Philosophy and Literature 11 (2):358-360.
Camus.David Sherman - 2009 - Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Why Can't We Sell Human Rights Like We Sell Soap?Robert C. Hornik - 2012 - In Ryan Goodman, Derek Jinks & Andrew K. Woods (eds.), Understanding Social Action, Promoting Human Rights. Oup Usa. pp. 47.
Response to Yoram Hazony, The Philosophy of Hebrew Scripture.C. L. Brinks - 2014 - Journal of Analytic Theology 2:238-249.
What fools we were.Landon Schurtz - 2010 - The Philosophers' Magazine 49 (49):93-97.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-02

Downloads
127 (#139,617)

6 months
45 (#87,161)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references