Why Bourdieu? Five responses to Toril Moi’s question

Abstract

This paper presents five responses to Toril Moi’s question of why study Pierre Bourdieu, dividing them into responses which suppose that Bourdieu’s originality is negligible and responses which do not.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

What is a woman?: and other essays.Toril Moi - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Bourdieu, Critic of Foucault.Staf Callewaert - 2006 - Theory, Culture and Society 23 (6):73-98.
Empathy and the Disunity of Vicarious Experiences.Pierre Jacob - 2015 - Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia 6 (1):4-23.
The Clothes Have No Emperor.Charles Lemert - 2000 - Theory, Culture and Society 17 (1):97-106.
Ability Theories of Practice and Turner’s Criticism of Bourdieu.Julie Zahle - 2017 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 48 (4):553-567.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-31

Downloads
132 (#128,746)

6 months
52 (#71,565)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Mind and World.John Henry McDowell - 1994 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mind and World.John Mcdowell - 1996 - Philosophical Quarterly 46 (182):99-109.
Please Like This Paper.Lucy McDonald - 2021 - Philosophy 96 (3):335-358.

Add more references