Why are pastiches not subject to more commentary? The specialization answer

Abstract

There is a puzzle over why some literary works which are less esteemed are subject to more commentary and some literary works which are more esteemed are subject to less. By examining Max Beerbohm’s pastiche of Joseph Conrad, I propose an answer regarding pastiches.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Jung's Answer to Job: a commentary.Paul Bishop - 2002 - New York: Brunner-Routledge.
The Problem of Perfect Fakes.M. W. Rowe - 2012 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 71:151-175.
The Truth of the Fully-Engaged Subject.Yong Wang - 2022 - International Journal of Žižek Studies 16 (1).
The Puzzle of the Subject as Subject in Lonergan.Frederick E. Crowe - 2003 - International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (2):187-205.
The Puzzle of the Subject as Subject in Lonergan.Frederick E. Crowe - 2003 - International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (2):187-205.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-31

Downloads
63 (#250,762)

6 months
30 (#103,657)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references