Social anthropology summary: A.R. Radcliffe-Brown’s objections to Sir James Frazer

Abstract

This is a one page handout presenting some objections A.R. Radcliffe-Brown makes to Frazer on rites and Frazer's evolutionism.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

On Social Structure.A. R. Radcliffe-Brown - 1940 - Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 70 (1).
Method in Social Anthropology.A. R. Radcliffe-Brown & M. N. Srinivas - 1960 - Philosophy of Science 27 (3):313-314.
Wittgenstein on Vaihinger and Frazer.Carlos Alves Pereira - 2015 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 4 (1):145-165.
Anthropology in the context that produced it.Terence Rajivan Edward - 2014 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 6 (1):347-360.
Darwin and social theory.Kenneth E. Bock - 1955 - Philosophy of Science 22 (2):123-134.
Wittgenstein, Frazer, and Temperament.James C. Klagge - 2016 - In Aidan Seery, Josef G. F. Rothhaupt & Lars Albinus (eds.), Wittgenstein’s Remarks on Frazer: The Text and the Matter. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 233-248.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-11

Downloads
156 (#117,323)

6 months
67 (#63,103)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references