Relativism issues: The econocracy against multiple-choice questions

Abstract

This paper draws attention to a worry concerning what the book The econocracy says about multiple-choice questions versus essays. They face a problem reminiscent of the problems facing various kinds of relativism.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Beyond Information Recall: Sophisticated Multiple-Choice Questions in Philosophy.J. Robert Loftis - 2019 - American Association of Philosophy Teachers Studies in Pedagogy 5:89-122.
The Econocracy: The Perils of Leaving Economics to the Experts.Sine Bagatur - 2017 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 31 (3):324-327.
A test of a model for multiple-choice behavior.Marvin H. Detambel - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 49 (2):97.
Assessing concept possession as an explicit and social practice.Alessia Marabini & Luca Moretti - 2017 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 51 (4):801-816.
Multiple-choice probability learning.Karen Block & James R. Erickson - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1):72.
The difficulty of multiple choice test item alternatives.P. Horst - 1932 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 15 (4):469.
Multiple Indexing Relativism about Predicates of Taste.Dan Zeman - 2019 - Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía 51 (151):5-34.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-08

Downloads
82 (#196,682)

6 months
34 (#96,636)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references