Never been a colonialist? A further response to Mary Beard’s other stuff argument

Abstract

Mary Beard argues against the claim that its relationship to British colonialism adequately explains why The Golden Bough was popular, drawing attention to other stuff in the book aside from information about British colonies. I make an objection that British colonialists would have been interested in expanding their empire.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The Argument of the Beard.Douglas Walton - 1996 - Informal Logic 18 (2).
America in Midpassage.Charles Beard & Mary Beard - 1939 - Ethics 50 (1):111-115.
The Rise of American Civilization.Charles A. Beard, Mary R. Beard & Vernon Louis Parrington - 1927 - International Journal of Ethics 38 (1):112-115.
Some things about stuff.Shieva Kleinschmidt - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 135 (3):407-423.
The Right Stuff.Ned Markosian - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (4):665-687.
Essential stuff.Kristie Miller - 2008 - Ratio 21 (1):55–63.
The red-beard evolutionary explanation of human sociality.Vaios Koliofotis - 2021 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 43 (4):1-17.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-18

Downloads
99 (#169,458)

6 months
58 (#71,870)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references