More on the value of disciplines to the social sciences, and also the standpoint relativity of pretty wrapping

Abstract

This paper gives further feedback in response to the evening of presentations about the value of different disciplines to the social sciences, at the University of Manchester. I respond to Peter Lawler’s presentation for the politics department, or discipline area. The appendix responds to a remark which I found online about Laura Valentini, related to the main content.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Phenomenology of the cultural disciplines.Mano Daniel & Lester Embree (eds.) - 1994 - Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Subjectivism and objectivism in the social sciences.Alan Gewirth - 1954 - Philosophy of Science 21 (2):157-163.
Is There Such a Thing as a Social Science?Robert Vinten - 2016 - Dókos. Philosophical Review 17:53-86.
For Science in the Social Sciences. [REVIEW]Fay Brian - 2006 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (2):227-240.
The scientific domains of feminist standpoints.Sergio Sismondo - 1995 - Perspectives on Science 3 (1):49-65.
International Relations and Social Progress.R. I. Kosolapov - 1975 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 14 (2):22-52.
Lessons from biology for philosophy of the human sciences.Alex Rosenberg - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (1):3-19.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-25

Downloads
99 (#171,909)

6 months
44 (#88,857)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references