British anthropology and colonialism: what did Max Gluckman add?

Abstract

British structural-functionalist anthropology was criticized for ignoring colonial relations. What did Max Gluckman do to solve this problem? I quote from the pioneering anthropologist and use a fictional example to make the question more forceful. The fictional example reveals a minimal solution.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Are individuals a problem for British structural-functionalist anthropology?Terence Rajivan Edward - 2023 - IJRDO - Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research 9 (8):106-108.
Anthropology in the context that produced it.Terence Rajivan Edward - 2014 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 6 (1):347-360.
Bloch, Maurice.Muhammad A. Z. Mughal - 2013 - In Reece Jon McGee & Richard L. Warms (eds.), Theory in Social and Cultural Anthropology: An Encyclopedia. Sage Publications. pp. 77-80.
Anthropology: a continental perspective.Christoph Wulf - 2013 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-04

Downloads
146 (#123,760)

6 months
58 (#71,870)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references