Extending the boundaries of the Declaration of Helsinki: a case study of an unethical experiment in a non-medical setting

Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (2):126-129 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To examine the ethical issues involved in governmental decisions with potential health risks, we review the history of the decision to raise the interurban speed limit in Israel in light of its impact on road death and injury. In 1993, the Israeli Ministry of Transportation initiated an “experiment” to raise the interurban speed limit from 90 to 100 kph. The “experiment” did not include a protocol and did not specify cut-off points for early termination in the case of adverse results. After the raise in the speed limit, the death toll on interurban roads rose as a result of a sudden increase in speeds and case fatality rates. The committee's decision is a case study in unfettered human experimentation and public health risks when the setting is non-medical and lacks a defined ethical framework. The case study states the case for extending Helsinki type safeguards to experimentation in non-medical settings

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

After helsinki: Unresolved issues in international research.Ruth Macklin - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (1):17-36.
The 2008 Declaration of Helsinki: some reflections.S. Giordano - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (10):598-603.
Placebo and the helsinki declaration — what to do?Bozidar Vrhovac - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):81-93.
The Helsinki Declaration: why all the fuss?W. Tadd - 2000 - Nursing Ethics 7 (5):439-450.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
28 (#538,947)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Do we Need a Special Ethics for Research?Sven Ove Hansson - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (1):21-29.
Experiments: Why and How?Sven Ove Hansson - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (3):613-632.
Three Worries About Three Arguments for Research Exceptionalism.Stephen John - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (8):67-69.
Reversing “Research Exceptionalism”.Sven Ove Hansson - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (8):66-67.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation.Jeremy Bentham - 1780 - New York: Dover Publications. Edited by J. H. Burns & H. L. A. Hart.

Add more references