Why legal theory is political philosophy

Legal Theory 19 (4):331-346 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The concept of law is not a theorist's invention but one that people use every day. Thus one measure of the adequacy of a theory of law is its degree of fidelity to the concept as it is understood by those who use it. That means as far as possible. There are important truisms about the law that have an evaluative cast. The theorist has either to say what would make those evaluative truisms true or to defend her choice to dismiss them as false of law or not of the essence of law. Thus the legal theorist must give an account of the truth grounds of the more central evaluative truisms about law. This account is a theory of legitimacy. It will contain framing judgments that state logical relations between descriptive judgments and directly evaluative judgments. Framing judgments are not directly evaluative, nor do they entail directly evaluative judgments, but they are nonetheless moral judgments. Therefore, an adequate theory of law must make (some) moral judgments. This means that an adequate theory of law has to take a stand on certain (but not all) contested issues in political philosophy. Legal theory is thus a branch of political philosophy. Moreover, one cannot be a moral-aim functionalist about legal institutions without compromising one's positivism about legal norms

Similar books and articles

The Legal Philosophy of Internationally Assisted Tyrannicide.Shannon Brincat - 2009 - Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 34:151-192.
Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory Revisited.Fernando Atria - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
An Introduction to Rights.William A. Edmundson - 2006 - Cambridge University Press.
A Short History of Western Legal Theory.J. M. Kelly - 1992 - Oxford University Press UK.
The political philosophy of Arnold Brecht.Arnold Brecht - 1954 - New York: [Exposition Press]. Edited by Morris D. Forkosch.
Legal reasoning and legal theory revisited.Fernando Atria - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
The Methodology of Political Theory.Christian List & Laura Valentini - 2016 - In Herman Cappelen, Tamar Gendler & John P. Hawthorne (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Critical Notice: Force and Freedom: Can They Co-exist?Talia Fisher - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 24 (2):387-402.
Legal validity qua specific mode of existence.Dick W. P. Ruiter - 1997 - Law and Philosophy 16 (5):479 - 505.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-24

Downloads
727 (#21,073)

6 months
160 (#18,024)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William A. Edmundson
Georgia State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The autonomy of ethics.A. N. Prior - 1960 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 38 (3):199 – 206.
The Demarcation Problem in Jurisprudence: A New Case for Scepticism.Brian Leiter - 2011 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31 (4):663-677.
Can there be a theory of law?Joseph Raz - 2004 - In Martin P. Golding & William A. Edmundson (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 324–342.
Law as Co-ordination.John M. Finnis - 1989 - Ratio Juris 2 (1):97-104.

View all 14 references / Add more references