Towards structural systematicity in distributed, statically bound visual representations

Cognitive Science 27 (1):73-109 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The problem of representing the spatial structure of images, which arises in visual object processing, is commonly described using terminology borrowed from propositional theories of cognition, notably, the concept of compositionality. The classical propositional stance mandates representations composed of symbols, which stand for atomic or composite entities and enter into arbitrarily nested relationships. We argue that the main desiderata of a representational system—productivity and systematicity—can (indeed, for a number of reasons, should) be achieved without recourse to the classical, proposition‐like compositionality. We show how this can be done, by describing a systematic and productive model of the representation of visual structure, which relies on static rather than dynamic binding and uses coarsely coded rather than atomic shape primitives.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,764

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Localist but distributed representations.Stephen Grossberg - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):478-479.
Sound and Vision.Edward Jones-Imhotep - 2012 - Spontaneous Generations 6 (1):191-202.
The many ways to distribute distributed representations.A. Mike Burton - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):472-473.
Localist representations and theoretical clarity.Norman D. Cook - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):474-475.
Visual representations in science.William Goodwin - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (3):372-390.


Added to PP

12 (#920,243)

6 months
3 (#435,525)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?