No reconstruction, no impenetrability (at least not much) A commentary on ``Is vision continuous with cognition?'' by Z. Pylyshyn

Abstract

Two of the premises of the target paper -- surface reconstruction as the goal of early vision, and inaccessibility of intermediate stages in the process presumably leading to such reconstruction -- are questioned and found wanting.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

No reconstruction, no impenetrability (at least not much).Shimon Edelman - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):376-376.
Is early visual processing attention impenetrable?Su-Ling Yeh & I.-Ping Chen - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):400-400.
Knowledge and intention can penetrate early vision.Mary A. Peterson - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):389-390.
Vision and cognition: How do they connect?Zenon Pylyshyn - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):401-414.
The case for cognitive penetrability.Philippe G. Schyns - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):394-395.
Color memory penetrates early vision.James A. Schirillo - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):393-393.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
18 (#808,169)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Shimon Edelman
Cornell University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references