Arendt, Scholem, Benjamin

European Journal of Political Theory 5 (3):261-279 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Walter Benjamin’s idiosyncratic theory of revolutionary messianism was at the very crux of his influence on Hannah Arendt and Gershom Scholem. This article argues that Arendt adopted important aspects of Benjamin’s idea of revolution, but rejected his messianism, while Scholem rejected Benjamin’s belief in revolution and accepted his emphasis on the power of messianism as a political idea, but in a historical rather than metaphysical sense. As a result, in Arendt’s and Scholem’s political thought both the category of revolution and that of messianism as Benjamin understood them were radically transformed. This transformation attests to the wide-ranging impact of Benjamin’s political philosophy, as well as to the complex and hitherto misrecognized intellectual relationship between Arendt and Scholem

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Walter Benjamin: The Story of a Friendship.Richard Wolin - 1983 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1983 (58):219-227.
A Language of the Border: On Scholem’s Theory of Lament.Ilit Ferber - 2013 - Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 21 (2):161-186.
Arendt and Benjamin: Tradition, Progress and Break with the Past.Gaye İlhan Demiryol - 2018 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 12 (1):142-163.
Jewish to the core.Suzanne Vromen - 2010 - In Roger Berkowitz (ed.), Thinking in Dark Times: Hannah Arendt on Ethics and Politics. New York: Fordham University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
57 (#268,918)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?