Some Remarks on Laudan’s Theory of Scientific Rationality

Journal of Philosophical Research 15:153-167 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When is it rational to pursue a research tradition? In Progress and Its Problems, Laudan suggests that if a research tradition RT has a higher rate of progress than any of its rivals, where the rate of progress of an RT is the problem solving effectiveness of its theories over time, then it is rational to pursue RT. In this paper I offer a number of criticisms of this suggestion, with special attention to the current controversy over the rational pursuability of cognitive science

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,213

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some Problems for "Progress and its Problems".H. Krips - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (4):601-616.
Rational Reconstruction and Immature Science.Stuart Silvers - 1996 - Philosophical Psychology 9 (1):93 – 109.
A Response to the Critique of Rational Choice Theory: Lakatos' and Laudan's Conceptions Applied.Kaisa Herne & Maija Setälä - 2004 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 47 (1):67 – 85.
Progress and Rationality: Laudan's Attempt to Divorce a Happy Couple.Matthias Kaiser - 1991 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 34 (4):433-455.
Theory-Assessment in the Historiography of Science.James W. McAllister - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (3):315-333.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
51 (#227,859)

6 months
1 (#414,449)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references