Journal of Philosophy 118 (7):345-372 (2021)

Authors
Santiago Echeverri
National Autonomous University of Mexico
Abstract
A traditional view holds that the self-concept is essentially indexical. In a highly influential article, Ruth Millikan famously held that the self-concept should be understood as a Millian name with a sui generis functional role. This article presents a novel explanatory argument against the Millian view and in favor of the indexical view. The argument starts from a characterization of the self-concept as a device of information integration. It then shows that the indexical view yields a better explanation of the integration function than the Millian view. The resulting account can rebut Millikan’s objections and it has broader implications for the debate on the essential indexical.
Keywords First person  Essential indexical  Mental indexicals  Self
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/jphil2021118727
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Attitudes de Dicto and de Se.David Lewis - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (4):513-543.
Advertisement for a Semantics for Psychology.Ned Block - 1986 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 10 (1):615-678.
Frege on Demonstratives.John Perry - 1977 - Philosophical Review 86 (4):474-497.
Inverted Earth.Ned Block - 1990 - Philosophical Perspectives 4:53-79.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Born Believer?Mark Siderits - 2021 - Comparative Philosophy 12 (1).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Indexicals: What They Are Essential For.Olav Gjelsvik - 2017 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 60 (3):295-314.
Temporal Indexicals Are Essential.Daniel Morgan - 2019 - Analysis 79 (3):452-461.
Kapitan on Indexicals and Indexical Thought: A Retrospective.Matthew Babb - 2019 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 57 (2):279-294.
Acting Without Me: Corporate Agency and the First Person Perspective.Herman Cappelen & Joshua Dever - 2020 - In Stephen Biggs & Heimir Geirsson (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Reference. New York: Routledge. pp. 599-613.
Cognitive Dynamics and Indexicals.Simon Prosser - 2005 - Mind and Language 20 (4):369–391.
The Use-Conditional Indexical Conception of Proper Names.Dolf Rami - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (1):119-150.
Indexical Identification: A Perspectival Account.Tomis Kapitan - 2001 - Philosophical Psychology 14 (3):293 – 312.
Constructing Contexts.Brett Sherman - 2015 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 2.
XII—Why Are Indexicals Essential?Simon Prosser - 2015 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 115 (3pt3):211-233.
The Indexical Nature of Sensory Concepts.John O'Dea - 2002 - Philosophical Papers 32 (2):169-181.
Impersonal Intentions.Daniel Morgan - 2018 - Philosophical Quarterly 68 (271):376-384.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-07-22

Total views
212 ( #53,985 of 2,507,062 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #22,796 of 2,507,062 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes