Epistemology without concepts?: Penelope Maddy: What do philosophers do? Skepticism and the practice of philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, xi+248pp, $29.95 HB [Book Review]

Metascience 27 (1):117-121 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Review of Penelope Maddy, What Do Philosophers Do? Skepticism and the Practice of Philosophy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017, 248 pp.)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2017

DOI

10.1007/s11016-017-0263-1

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The a to Z of Epistemology.Ralph Baergen - 2010 - Scarecrow Press.
Introduction: A Thicker Epistemology?Ben Kotzee & Jeremy Wanderer - 2008 - Philosophical Papers 37 (3):337-343.
The Genealogy of Epistemic Virtue Concepts.Alan Thomas - 2008 - Philosophical Papers 37 (3):345-369.
Historical dictionary of epistemology.Ralph Baergen - 2006 - Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press.
Review of Stephen Napier, Virtue Epistemology: Motivation and Knowledge. [REVIEW]Guy Axtell - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (7).
Reason, knowledge, experience. Reconstructing (not only) traditional concepts in feminist epistemology.E. Farkasova & M. Szapuova - 2001 - Filozofia 56 (7):463-473.
Reason, Knowledge, Experience: The Reconstruction of the Traditional Concepts in Feminist Epistemology. E. Farkašová - 2001 - Filozofia 56:463-473.
Naturalism and the normativity of epistemology.James Maffie - 1990 - Philosophical Studies 59 (3):333 - 349.
Naturalism, scientism and the independence of epistemology.James Maffie - 1995 - Erkenntnis 43 (1):1 - 27.
Concepts and conceptual change.Paul R. Thagard - 1990 - Synthese 82 (2):255-74.
Foundations: A Manual for the Beginning Student of Epistemology.Claude L. Fox - 1999 - Upa.
Just the Right Thickness: A Defense of Second-Wave Virtue Epistemology.Guy Axtell & J. Adam Carter - 2008 - Philosophical Papers 37 (3):413-434.
Education and “thick” epistemology.Ben Kotzee - 2011 - Educational Theory 61 (5):549-564.
Concepts: Where Fodor went wrong.A. Levine & Mark H. Bickhard - 1999 - Philosophical Psychology 12 (1):5-23.
Thick Concepts.Debbie Roberts - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (8):677-688.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-10

Downloads
220 (#88,551)

6 months
51 (#81,183)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Santiago Echeverri
National Autonomous University of Mexico

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The significance of philosophical scepticism.Barry Stroud - 1984 - New York: Oxford University Press.
A plea for excuses.John Austin - 1957 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57:1--30.
The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism.John Heil - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):331-336.
Logic and conversation.Herbert Paul Grice - 1967 - In Paul Grice (ed.), Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press. pp. 41-58.
The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism.Roger Squires - 1986 - Philosophical Quarterly 36 (145):558-560.

View all 6 references / Add more references