Aquinas on Euthanasia, Suffering, and Palliative Care

The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 3 (2):331-354 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Euthanasia, today, is one of the most debated issues in bioethics. Euthanasia, at the time of Thomas Aquinas, was an unheard-of term. Nevertheless, while there is no direct statement with respect to “euthanasia” per se in the writings of Aquinas, Aquinas’s moral theory and certain theological commitments he held could be applied to the euthanasia question and thus bring Aquinas into contemporary bioethical debate. In this paper, I present the relevant aspects of Aquinas’s account of natural law and his theological views on suffering, examining what conclusions each entails with respect to directly intended euthanasia. I then proceed to discuss cases that involve either the administration of palliative medication that hastens death, terminal sedation, or the non-utilization of life-sustaining treatment. This involves a detailed investigation into Aquinas’s account of human intentional action and the question of whether Aquinas holds some form of the Principle of Double-Effect. I end with a final statement of Aquinas’s position on these various types of cases as a synthesis of the conclusions drawn from the different areas of his thought discussed in this paper. My aim is to provide a set of guidelines, based upon Aquinas’s thought, for those who may be faced with decisions regarding the proper form of palliative treatment to be provided to those suffering from a painful terminal illness. Decision-makers, in such cases, may include a terminally ill patient, a patient’s immediate family, health care providers, and lawmakers concerned with establishing the legality of certain forms of treatment. Establishing a clear set of moral guidelines, specifically addressed to this type of decision, can assist the relevant decision-makers in forming their consciences such that they may take the appropriate course of action in confronting the suffering of a terminally ill patient.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ethics of palliative care: European perspectives.Henk ten Have & David Clark (eds.) - 2002 - Phildelphia, PA: Open University Press.
Mahātmā Gandhi's view on euthanasia and assisted suicide.Joris Gielen - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (7):431-434.
Palliative Care and the QALY Problem.Jonathan Hughes - 2005 - Health Care Analysis 13 (4):289-301.
Commentary.Michael M. Burgess - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):363-366.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-12

Downloads
100 (#160,085)

6 months
13 (#118,494)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jason Eberl
Saint Louis University

Citations of this work

Protecting reasonable conscientious refusals in health care.Jason T. Eberl - 2019 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 40 (6):565-581.
Creating non-human persons: Might it be worth the risk?Jason T. Eberl - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (5):52 – 54.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references