The Role of the Humanities and Social Sciences in Nanotechnology Research and Development

NanoEthics 2 (3):333-333 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The experience with genetically modified foods has been prominent in motivating science, industry and regulatory bodies to address the social and ethical dimensions of nanotechnology. The overall objective is to gain the general public’s acceptance of nanotechnology in order not to provoke a consumer boycott as it happened with genetically modified foods. It is stated implicitly in reports on nanotechnology research and development that this acceptance depends on the public’s confidence in the technology and that the confidence is created on the basis of information, education, openness and debate about scientific and technological developments. Hence, it is assumed that informing and educating the public will create trust, which will consequently lead to an acceptance of nanotechnology. Thus, the humanities and social sciences are seen as tools to achieve public acceptance. In this paper, the author argues that this is a narrow apprehension of the role of the humanities and social sciences. The humanities and social sciences have a critical function asking fundamental questions and informing the public about these reflections. This may lead to scepticism, however, the motivation for addressing the social and ethical dimensions of nanotechnology should not be public acceptance but informed judgement. The author illustrates this critical function by discussing the role, motivation and contribution of ethics as an example. Lastly, the author shows that a possible strategy for incorporating the humanities and the social sciences into nanotechnology research and development is Real-Time Technology Assessment, where the purpose is to integrate natural science and engineering investigations with ethical, legal and social science from the outset

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,102

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Collaboration in the sciences and the humanities: A comparative phenomenology.Leslie A. Real - 2012 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 11 (3):250-261.
The National Nanotechnology Initiative and the Social Good.Ronald Sandler & W. D. Kay - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (4):675-681.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
57 (#258,750)

6 months
5 (#311,051)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
Engines of Creation.Eric Drexler (ed.) - 1986 - Fourth Estate.
Nano-ethics.Wade L. Robison - 2004 - In Baird D. (ed.), Discovering the Nanoscale. Ios. pp. 285--299.

Add more references