The Unruh effect for philosophers

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42 (2):81-97 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The importance of the Unruh effect lies in the fact that, together with the related Hawking effect, it serves to link the three main branches of modern physics: thermal/statistical physics, relativity theory/gravitation, and quantum physics. However, different researchers can have in mind different phenomena when they speak of “the Unruh effect” in flat spacetime and its generalization to curved spacetimes. Three different approaches are reviewed here. They are shown to yield results that are sometimes concordant and sometimes discordant. The discordance is disconcerting only if one insists on taking literally the definite article in “the Unruh effect.” It is argued that the role of linking different branches of physics is better served by taking “the Unruh effect” to designate a family of related phenomena. The relation between the Hawking effect and the generalized Unruh effect for curved spacetimes is briefly discussed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Who is entitled to double effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.
Why can't a woman be more like a man?Anita M. Unruh - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (3):467-468.
Dewey, Hegel, and Causation.Jim Good & Jim Garrison - 2010 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 24 (2):101-120.
The Problem of ESEE Knowledge.John Turri - 2014 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 1:101-127.
Is philosophy irrelevant to science?James Franklin - 2009 - Philosopher's Zone (ABC Radio National):0-0.
Intentions, motives and the doctrine of double effect.Lawrence Masek - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):567-585.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-22

Downloads
197 (#97,078)

6 months
9 (#250,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Earman
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

The case for black hole thermodynamics part I: Phenomenological thermodynamics.David Wallace - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 64:52-67.
Particles in Quantum Field Theory.Doreen Fraser - 2022 - In Eleanor Knox & Alastair Wilson (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Physics. London, UK: Routledge. pp. 323-336.
The fundamentality of fields.Charles T. Sebens - 2022 - Synthese 200 (5):1-28.
The Ontology of Quantum Field Theory: Structural Realism Vindicated?David Glick - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 59:78-86.
Singularities and Black holes.Erik Curiel - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references