Essential self-adjointness: implications for determinism and the classical–quantum correspondence

Synthese 169 (1):27-50 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is argued that seemingly “merely technical” issues about the existence and uniqueness of self-adjoint extensions of symmetric operators in quantum mechanics have interesting implications for foundations problems in classical and quantum physics. For example, pursuing these technical issues reveals a sense in which quantum mechanics can cure some of the forms of indeterminism that crop up in classical mechanics; and at the same time it reveals the possibility of a form of indeterminism in quantum mechanics that is quite distinct from the indeterminism of state vector collapse. More generally, the examples considered indicate that the classical–quantum correspondence is more intricate and delicate than is generally appreciated. The aim of the article is to give a series of examples that reveal why the technical issues about self-adjointness are relevant to the philosophy of science and that help to make the issues accessible to philosophers of science.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Quantum statistical determinism.Eftichios Bitsakis - 1988 - Foundations of Physics 18 (3):331-355.
Quantum Teleportation.H. J. Kimble - 1999 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 7:141-146.
Philosophy of Physics.Jeremy Butterfield & John Earman (eds.) - 2006 - Amsterdam and Boston: Elsevier.
The self-adjointness of Hermitian Hamiltonians.Chengjun Zhu & John R. Klauder - 1993 - Foundations of Physics 23 (4):617-631.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
134 (#132,589)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Earman
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

Entropy - A Guide for the Perplexed.Roman Frigg & Charlotte Werndl - 2011 - In Claus Beisbart & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), Probabilities in Physics. Oxford University Press. pp. 115-142.
Can the world be shown to be indeterministic after all?Christian Wuthrich - 2010 - In Claus Beisbart & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), Probabilities in Physics. Oxford University Press. pp. 365--389.
Randomness? What Randomness?Klaas Landsman - 2020 - Foundations of Physics 50 (2):61-104.
Observables, disassembled.Bryan W. Roberts - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 63:150-162.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The philosophy of quantum mechanics.Max Jammer - 1974 - New York,: Wiley. Edited by Max Jammer.
The structure and interpretation of quantum mechanics.R. I. G. Hughes - 1989 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View.Paul Teller & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1995 - Philosophical Review 104 (3):457.
Interpreting the Quantum World.Jeffrey Bub - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (4):637-641.

View all 14 references / Add more references