Do the laws of physics forbid the operation of time machines?

Synthese 169 (1):91-124 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We address the question of whether it is possible to operate a time machine by manipulating matter and energy so as to manufacture closed timelike curves. This question has received a great deal of attention in the physics literature, with attempts to prove no-go theorems based on classical general relativity and various hybrid theories serving as steps along the way towards quantum gravity. Despite the effort put into these no-go theorems, there is no widely accepted definition of a time machine. We explain the conundrum that must be faced in providing a satisfactory definition and propose a resolution. Roughly, we require that all extensions of the time machine region contain closed timelike curves; the actions of the time machine operator are then sufficiently “potent” to guarantee that closed timelike curves appear. We then review no-go theorems based on classical general relativity, semi-classical quantum gravity, quantum field theory on curved spacetime, and Euclidean quantum gravity. Our verdict on the question of our title is that no result of sufficient generality to underwrite a confident “yes” has been proven. Our review of the no-go results does, however, highlight several foundational problems at the intersection of general relativity and quantum physics that lend substance to the search for an answer.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Time travel and time machines.Chris Smeenk & Christian Wuthrich - 2011 - In Craig Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 577-630.
From metaphysics to physics.Gordon Belot & John Earman - 1999 - In Jeremy Butterfield & Constantine Pagonis (eds.), From Physics to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 166--86.
The arguments of time.Jeremy Butterfield (ed.) - 1999 - New York: Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press.
What is Time in Modern Physics?Ivan Karpenko - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 49 (3):105-123.
The Arguments of Time.Jeremy Butterfield (ed.) - 1999 - New York: Oup/British Academy.
Pre-socratic quantum gravity.Gordon Belot & John Earman - 2001 - In Craig Callender & Nick Huggett (eds.), Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale. Cambridge University Press. pp. 213--55.
Condensed Matter Lessons About the Origin of Time.Gil Jannes - 2015 - Foundations of Physics 45 (3):279-294.
Quantum gravity and the nature of space and time.Keizo Matsubara - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (3):e12405.
Quantum concepts in space and time.Roger Penrose & C. J. Isham (eds.) - 1986 - New York ;: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-21

Downloads
51 (#305,341)

6 months
23 (#115,843)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Chris Smeenk
University of Western Ontario
Christian Wüthrich
University of Geneva

Citations of this work

Time travel and time machines.Chris Smeenk & Christian Wuthrich - 2011 - In Craig Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 577-630.
Global Spacetime Structure.John Byron Manchak - 2013 - Cambridge University Press.
The Great Loop: From Conformal Cyclic Cosmology to Aeon Monism.Baptiste Le Bihan - 2024 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie.
Relativistic spacetimes and definitions of determinism.Juliusz Doboszewski - 2019 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9 (2):24.
Malament–Hogarth Machines.J. B. Manchak - 2020 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (3):1143-1153.

View all 26 citations / Add more citations