Advancing Methods in Empirical Bioethics: Bioxphi Meets Digital Technologies

American Journal of Bioethics 21 (6):53-56 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Historically, empirical research in bioethics has drawn on methods developed within the social sciences, including qualitative interviews, focus groups, ethnographic studies, and opinion surveys, t...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

From X-phi to Bioxphi: Lessons in Conceptual Analysis 2.0.Jonathan Lewis - 2020 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 11 (1):34-36.
AI Methods in Bioethics.Joshua August Skorburg, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Vincent Conitzer - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics: Empirical Bioethics 1 (11):37-39.
Empowerment or Engagement? Digital Health Technologies for Mental Healthcare.Christopher Burr & Jessica Morley - 2020 - In Christopher Burr & Silvia Milano (eds.), The 2019 Yearbook of the Digital Ethics Lab. pp. 67-88.
Pragmatism for a Digital Society: The (In)Significance of Artificial Intelligence and Neural Technology.Matthew Sample & Eric Racine - 2021 - In Orsolya Friedrich, Andreas Wolkenstein, Christoph Bublitz, Ralf J. Jox & Eric Racine (eds.), Clinical Neurotechnology meets Artificial Intelligence. Springer. pp. 81-100.
Do Animals Have Technologies?Galit Wellner - 2017 - Studia Phaenomenologica 17:265-282.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-27

Downloads
33 (#459,370)

6 months
13 (#165,103)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Ivar Hannikainen
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
Emilian Mihailov
University of Bucharest
Brian D. Earp
University of Oxford