Reply to Stone on Counterpart Theory and Four-Dimensionalism

Analysis 67 (2):159 - 162 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recently, Jim Stone has argued that counterpart theory is incompatible with the existence of temporal parts. I demonstrate that there is no such incompatibility.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-8284.2007.00667.x

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Kripkean Counterpart Theory.Murali Ramachandran - 2008 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):89-106.
Counterpart theory and four-dimensionalism: A reply to Eagle.Jim Stone - 2007 - Analysis 67 (3):263–267.
Counterpart theory and three-dimensionalism: A reply.Jim Stone - 2005 - Analysis 65 (4):325–329.
Why Counterpart Theory and Three-Dimensionalism are Incompatible.Jim Stone - 2005 - Analysis 65 (1):24-27.
Why counterpart theory and modal realism are incompatible.Jim Stone - 2009 - Analysis 69 (4):650-653.
Persistence, Ontic Vagueness and Identity: Towards a Substantialist Four–dimensionalism. [REVIEW]Enrique Romerales - 2008 - Metaphysica 9 (1):33-55.
Modal realism, counterpart theory, and the possibility of multiversal rectitude.E. Conee - 2011 - Analysis 71 (4):680-684.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
511 (#34,289)

6 months
109 (#33,214)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Antony Eagle
University of Adelaide

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Four Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time.Theodore Sider - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (3):642-647.
Things and Their Parts.Kit Fine - 1999 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 23 (1):61-74.
Four-Dimensional Objects.Peter Van Inwagen - 1990 - Noûs 24 (2):245--255.

View all 7 references / Add more references