Sheep complexity outside the laboratory

Animal Sentience 233:1-3 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Marino & Merskin’s review shows that sheep are intelligent and highly social but their methodology has some shortcomings. I describe five problems with reviewing only the academic and scientific literature and suggest how one might provide an even more compelling case for the complexity of sheep minds.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mulesing and Animal Ethics.Joanne Sneddon & Bernard Rollin - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (4):371-386.
The sentience shift in animal research.Heather Browning & Walter Veit - 2022 - The New Bioethics 28 (4):299-314.
Advances in agricultural animal welfare: science and practice.Joy A. Mench (ed.) - 2018 - Duxford, United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing, an imprint of Elsevier.
How Prejudice Affects the Study of Animal Minds.Keefner Ashley - 2017 - Dissertation, University of Waterloo

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-03

Downloads
526 (#53,665)

6 months
124 (#43,208)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Cheryl (C.E.) Abbate
University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references