Lakatos between Marxism and the Hungarian heuristic tradition

Studies in East European Thought 67 (1-2):61-73 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Imre Lakatos gained fame in the English-speaking world as a follower and critic of philosopher of science Karl Popper. However, Lakatos’ background involved other philosophical and scientific sources from his native Hungary. Lakatos surreptitiously used Hegelian Marxism in his works on philosophy of science and mathematics, disguising it with the rhetoric of the Popper school. He also less surreptitiously incorporated, particularly in his treatment of mathematics, work of the strong tradition of heuristics in twentieth century Hungary. Both his Marxism and his emphasis on heuristics contained a view of science and mathematics that contrasted with the mainstream of Anglo-American philosophy of science. Both involved a dynamic view of science, whether historical or psychological, and an emphasis on practice as opposed to static, formal representations of scientific theories

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Chocolate and Chess (Unlocking Lakatos). [REVIEW]John Kadvany - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (2):276-286.
An hungarian tragedy.Jerome R. Ravetz - 2004 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 47 (4):413 – 422.
Curried Lakatos or, How Not to Spice up the Norm-Ladenness Thesis.Stephen J. Wykstra - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:29 - 39.
Lakatos’ philosophical work in Hungary.Gábor Kutrovátz - 2008 - Studies in East European Thought 60 (1-2):113-133.
Lakatos' Philosophical Work in Hungary.Gábor Kutrovátz - 2008 - Studies in East European Thought 60 (1-2):113 - 133.
Hungarian Studies on Imre Lakatos.Richard Henry Schmitt - 2007 - Tradition and Discovery 34 (2):51-53.
The Challenge to Consensus.William T. Lynch - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (3):57-61.
Letters.John Kadvany - 2003 - Philosophia Mathematica 11 (3):364-364.
Imre Lakatos and the Guises of Reason.John David Kadvany - 2001 - Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-05-28

Downloads
40 (#387,619)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Val Dusek
University of New Hampshire, Durham

Citations of this work

Creativity in Science and the ‘Anthropological Turn’ in Virtue Theory.Ian James Kidd - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (1):1-16.
After the Gold Rush: Cleaning Up after Steve Fuller’s Theosis.William T. Lynch - 2018 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 48 (5):505-523.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Personal knowledge.Michael Polanyi - 1958 - Chicago,: University of Chicago Press.
The Tacit Dimension. --.Michael Polanyi & Amartya Sen - 1966 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
Patterns of discovery.Norwood Russell Hanson - 1958 - Cambridge [Eng.]: University Press.
Conjectures and Refutations.K. Popper - 1963 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 21 (3):431-434.

View all 55 references / Add more references