History of the Human Sciences 11 (2):25-44 (1998)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Feyerabend and Lakatos were invited to be assistants of the literary Marxists Brecht and Lukács, respectively. In the 1930s Expressionism Debate, Lukács associated artistic expressionism with irrationalism and fascism, while Brecht criticized Lukács' anti-modernism. Lakatos' criti cisms of Kuhn echo Lukács' denunciations of German idealism, and Lukács influenced the terminology and topics in Lakatos' methodol ogy. Lakatos, concerned with progress, and fearful of irrationalism and degeneration, recapitulates positions of his teacher, Lukács, in the latter's attack on modern art. Feyerabend's criticisms of Lakatos paral lel Brecht's critique of Lukács
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1177/095269519801100202 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave - 1972 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 3 (1):158-162.
View all 25 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Lakatos' Philosophical Work in Hungary.Gábor Kutrovátz - 2008 - Studies in East European Thought 60 (1-2):113 - 133.
Lakatos’ Philosophical Work in Hungary.Gábor Kutrovátz - 2008 - Studies in East European Thought 60 (1-2):113-133.
Similar books and articles
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-11-01
Total views
27 ( #422,825 of 2,504,831 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,030 of 2,504,831 )
2013-11-01
Total views
27 ( #422,825 of 2,504,831 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,030 of 2,504,831 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads