What did Susanne Langer really mean?

Sociological Theory 12 (3):254-265 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The social philosophy of meaning and emotions represented in the work of Susanne Langer was recognized by Talcott Parsons, but has yet to be incorporated into mainstream sociological theoritizations. Langer's work is as potentially important to contemporary microsociology, and the sociology of emotions, as the work of Peirce, Mead, or Schutz. The impediment to appreciating her work resides in contemporary confusions regarding the nature of logic. Sociologists often subscribe to Wittgenstein's denial of the validity of formal logic in constructing theories of human behavior. Langer has been misunderstood because her theoretizations address more than discursive logics and meanings. The thrust of Langer's work is that logic and meaning exist on a nondiscursive level of emotions. Though her work is more than 50 years old, we are now in a position to appreciate it because we are now exploring and conceptualizing the notion of social inferencing as existing beyond formal logic

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
61 (#258,521)

6 months
9 (#290,637)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A collective fixation of meaning.Carlo Brentari - 2019 - Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 1 (2):143-161.
Langer and the claim for the social value of art.Dorit Barchana-Lorand - forthcoming - Journal of Philosophy of Education.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references