- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Scientific Pluralism and the Plurality of the Sciences: Comments on David Hull’s S cience as a Process
Philosophical Studies 60 (1-2):61 - 76 (1990)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
David Hull's evolutionary model for the progress and process of science.David Oldroyd - 1990 - Biology and Philosophy 5 (4):473-487.
Selection and science: Critical notice of David Hull's science as a process. [REVIEW]Alex Rosenberg - 1992 - Biology and Philosophy 7 (2):217-228.
Is science an evolutionay process? Evidence from miscitation of the scientific literature.Kim J. Vicente - 2000 - Perspectives on Science 8 (1):53-69.
The Evolution of Scientific Lineages.Michael Bradie - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:245 - 254.
Review: Plurality, Pluralism, and Comparative Ethics: A Review Essay. [REVIEW]John Kelsay - 1996 - Journal of Religious Ethics 24 (2):403 - 428.
Peirce and Royce and the Betrayal of Science: Scientific Fraud and Misconduct.Jacquelyn Anne K. Kegley - 2010 - The Pluralist 5 (2):87-104.
Phylogenetic Analogies in the Conceptual Development of Science.Brent D. Mishler - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:225-235.
From Hacking's Plurality of Styles of Scientific Reasoning to “Foliated” Pluralism: A Philosophically Robust Form of Ontologico-Methodological Pluralism.Stéphanie Ruphy - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (5):1212-1222.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
87 (#191,321)
6 months
3 (#1,002,413)
2009-01-28
Downloads
87 (#191,321)
6 months
3 (#1,002,413)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Toward Philosophy of Science’s Social Engagement.Angela Potochnik & Francis Cartieri - 2013 - Erkenntnis 79 (Suppl 5):901-916.
Studying the study of science scientifically.David L. Hull - 1998 - Perspectives on Science 6 (3):209-231.
Conceptual Evolution: a Response.David L. Hull - 1990 - PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990 (2):255-264.
References found in this work
A Radical Solution to the Species Problem.Michael T. Ghiselin - 1974 - Systematic Zoology 23 (4):536–544.
The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme.S. J. Gould & R. C. Lewontin - 1979 - In E. Sober (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology. The Mit Press. Bradford Books. pp. 73-90.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-l2pxr uwo