Process epistemology in the COVID-19 era: rethinking the research process to avoid dangerous forms of reification
European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12 (1):1-22 (2022)
AbstractWhether we live in a world of autonomous things, or a world of interconnected processes in constant flux, is an ancient philosophical debate. Modern biology provides decisive reasons for embracing the latter view. How does one understand the practices and outputs of science in such a dynamic, ever-changing world - and particularly in an emergency situation such as the COVID-19 pandemic, where scientific knowledge has been regarded as bedrock for decisive social interventions? We argue that key to answering this question is to consider the role of the activity of reification within the research process. Reification consists in the identification of more or less stable features of the flux, and treating these as constituting stable things. As we illustrate with reference to biological and biomedical research on COVID-19, reification is a necessary component of any process of inquiry and comes in at least two forms: means reification, when researchers create objects meant to capture features of the world, or phenomena, in order to be able to study them; and target reification, when researchers infer an understanding of phenomena from an investigation of the epistemic objects created to study them. We note that both objects and phenomena are dynamic processes and argue that have no reason to assume that changes in objects and phenomena track one another. We conclude that failure to acknowledge these forms of reification and their epistemic role in scientific inquiry can have dire consequences for how the resulting knowledge is interpreted and used.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science.John Dupré - 1993 - Harvard University Press.
Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality.William C. Wimsatt - 2007 - Harvard University Press.
Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism.Hasok Chang - 2012 - Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science.
Science as a Process an Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science.David L. Hull - 1988 - University of Chicago Press.
Citations of this work
Maps and Models.Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther - forthcoming - In Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Scientific Modeling. London, UK:
‘Medical Corona Science’: Philosophical and Systemic Issues: Re‐Thinking Medicine? On the Epistemology of Corona Medicine.Felix Tretter & James Marcum - forthcoming - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice.
Similar books and articles
Rethinking Law as Process: Creativity, Novelty, Change.James MacLean - 2011 - Routledge.
Systematic Knowledge Research. Rethinking Epistemology.Günter Abel - 2014 - Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia 5 (1):13-28.
Process and Dipolar Reality: An Essay in Process, Event Metaphysics: Rethinking Whitehead's Categoreal Scheme. [REVIEW]Daniel Dombrowski - 2016 - Process Studies 45 (2):280-282.
Let’s Do Better: Public Representations of COVID-19 Science.Tania Bubela, Timothy Caulfield, Jonathan Kimmelman & Vardit Ravitsky - 2020 - Ottawa, Canada:
Towards a Dual Process Epistemology of Imagination.Michael T. Stuart - 2019 - Synthese (2):1-22.
A Heterogeneous Branching Process with Immigration Modeling for COVID-19 Spreading in Local Communities in China.Lin Zhang, Haochen Wang, Zhongyang Liu, Xiao Fan Liu, Xin Feng & Ye Wu - 2021 - Complexity 2021:1-11.
Linking Ontology, Epistemology And Research Methodology.Mukhles M. Al-Ababneh - 2020 - Science and Philosophy 8 (1):75-91.
Actual and Perceived Knowledge About COVID-19: The Role of Information Behavior in Media.Julia S. Granderath, Christina Sondermann, Andreas Martin & Martin Merkt - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
Epistemology at Work: The Ontological Relationship Between Feminist Methods, Intersubjectivity and Nursing Research – a Research Exemplar.Ruth Walter, Nel Glass & Kierrynn Davis - unknown
A Note on the Debate on Scientific Process Vs. Design Process.Damien Motte & Robert Bjärnemo - unknown
Metacognition as Evidence for Evidentialism.Matthew Frise - 2018 - In Kevin McCain (ed.), Believing in Accordance with the Evidence: New Essays on Evidentialism. Springer. pp. 91-107.
Open Science Saves Lives: Lessons From the COVID-19 Pandemic.Lonni Besançon, Nathan Peiffer-Smadja, Corentin Segalas, Haiting Jiang, Paola Masuzzo, Cooper Smout, Maxime Deforet & Clémence Leyrat - 2020 - bioRxiv 2020 (8):1-19.