Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (7):436-440 (2020)

Authors
Dominic Wilkinson
Oxford University
Abstract
As the COVID-19 pandemic impacts on health service delivery, health providers are modifying care pathways and staffing models in ways that require health professionals to be reallocated to work in critical care settings. Many of the roles that staff are being allocated to in the intensive care unit and emergency department pose additional risks to themselves, and new policies for staff reallocation are causing distress and uncertainty to the professionals concerned. In this paper, we analyse a range of ethical issues associated with changes to staff allocation processes in the face of COVID-19. In line with a dominant view in the medical ethics literature, we claim, first, that no individual health professional has a specific, positive obligation to treat a patient when doing so places that professional at risk of harm, and so there is a clear ethical tension in any reallocation process in this context. Next, we argue that the changing asymmetries of health needs in hospitals means that careful consideration needs to be given to a stepwise process for deallocating staff from their usual duties. We conclude by considering how a justifiable process of reallocating professionals to high-risk clinical roles should be configured once those who are ‘fit for reallocation’ have been identified. We claim that this process needs to attend to three questions that we consider in detail: how the choice to make reallocation decisions is made, what justifiable models for reallocation might look like and what is owed to those who are reallocated.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2020-106284
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,130
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

COVID-19 Current Controversies.Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (7):419-420.
Beyond Duty: Medical “Heroes” and the COVID-19 Pandemic.Wendy Lipworth - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (4):723-730.
My Fear, My Morals: A Surgeon’s Perspective of the COVID Crisis.Shabir A. Dhar & Zaid A. Wani - 2020 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 15 (1):1-3.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

COVID-19 and Healthcare Professionals: The Principle of the Common Good.Randy A. Tudy - 2020 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 30 (4):170-174.
Ethics, EBM, and Hospital Management.N. Biller-Andorno - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (2):136-140.
Impacts of COVID19 Pandemic on Care of the Patients with Cancer.Esra Bilir - 2020 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 30 (3):111-113.
Health Risks and the Health Care Professional.Helen L. Treanor - 2000 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (3):251-254.
Ethics and Public Health Emergencies: Encouraging Responsibility.Matthew K. Wynia - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (4):1 – 4.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-05-15

Total views
21 ( #534,601 of 2,506,503 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,244 of 2,506,503 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes