Social Investing: Mainstream or Backwater? [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):247 - 252 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Social investing, though not yet fully mainstream, has the potential to obtain such status. Questions relating to the future of social investing include the following. (1) What properly falls within the ambit of social investing? Assuming that no single definition of social responsibility is feasible, what then are the limits? (2) What do we need to know about investor psychology concerning social investing? What motivates people to buy socially screened investments and why do they sometimes act inconsistently? (3) How can we improve the measures of social performance? Is it possible to develop GAAP and GAAS equivalents for social reporting? (4) Should social reports by firms be audited? If so, how? (5) What sorts of public policies are necessary to support the social screening of investments?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Socially Responsible Investing in the United States.Steve Schueth - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):189 - 194.
Healthy investments in investing in health.Derek Yach - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 33 (3):191 - 198.
Social Investing.Craig Cox - 1993 - Business Ethics 7 (6):39-40.
Social Investing.Doug Fleer - 1992 - Business Ethics 6 (4):42-42.
Social Investing.Biff Robillard - 1994 - Business Ethics 8 (6):39-39.
Social Investing.John C. Harrington - 1992 - Business Ethics 6 (5):38-38.
Social Investing.Ritchie P. Lowry - 1992 - Business Ethics 6 (3):31-31.
Social Investing.Peter D. Kinder - 1992 - Business Ethics 6 (2):39-39.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
36 (#431,270)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?