Infinite Regress Arguments as per impossibile Arguments in Aristotle: De Caelo 300a30–b1, Posterior Analytics 72b5–10, Physics V.2 225b33–226a10 [Book Review]

Rhizomata 10 (2):262-282 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Infinite regress arguments are a powerful tool in Aristotle, but this style of argument has received relatively little attention. Improving our understanding of infinite regress arguments has become pressing since recent scholars have pointed out that it is not clear whether Aristotle’s infinite regress arguments are, in general, effective or indeed what the logical structure of these arguments is. One obvious approach would be to hold that Aristotle takes infinite regress arguments to be per impossibile arguments, which derive an infinite sequence. Due to his finitism, Aristotle then rejects such a sequence as impossible. This paper argues that this obvious approach does not work, even for its most amenable cases. The paper argues instead that infinite regress arguments involve domain-specific infinities, and so there is not a general finitism which underpins infinite regress arguments in Aristotle, but rather domain-specific reasons that there cannot be an infinite number of entities in each domain in which Aristotle invokes an infinite regress argument.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,998

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Infinte Regress Arguments.Claude Gratton - 2009 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Aspects of the Logic of Infinite Regress Arguments.Claude Gratton - 1995 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Infinite Regress Arguments.Jan Willem Wieland - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (1):95-109.
On the Argument of Infinite Regress in Proving Self-awareness.King Chung Lo - 2018 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 46 (3):553-576.
Regress Argument Reconstruction.Jan Willem Wieland - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (4):489-503.
Viciousness and the structure of reality.Ricki Leigh Bliss - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (2):399-418.
Question-begging and infinite regress.Henry W. Johnstone - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (3):291-293.


Added to PP

17 (#869,613)

6 months
7 (#431,609)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew Duncombe
Nottingham University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Symbolic logic.Frederic Brenton Fitch - 1952 - New York,: Ronald Press Co..
Investigations into Logical Deduction.Gerhard Gentzen - 1964 - American Philosophical Quarterly 1 (4):288 - 306.
Completeness of an ancient logic.John Corcoran - 1972 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (4):696-702.

View all 31 references / Add more references