Authors
Abstract
In this article, I examine Dōgen’s Shōbōgenzō to reconsider the notion of hope, many discourses of which are characteristically future oriented. Although there is an overwhelming suspicion that hope is incompatible with Buddhism due to its forward-looking nature, I argue that Dōgen’s Buddhist soteriology can establish a present-focused conception of hope that can challenge the dominant discourses of hope. In this comparative analysis, I first examine the conditions for hope and show that most theories regard hope as teleological and future oriented. As Dōgen rejects a linear conception of time, a future-oriented hope collapses in Dōgen’s soteriology. Nevertheless, I argue that Dōgen’s theory of temporality can ascertain a new theory of hope grounded in the interconnectedness of all moments, a present-oriented conception of hope based on the radical teleology established within the moment of the absolute now. Through an analysis of Dōgen’s soteriology from the perspective of hope, it becomes evident that Dōgen’s theory of temporality creates a space for karmic causality while also emphasizing the non-obstruction between practice and enlightenment. Hence, the notion of hope presents a way in which we can reconcile the apparent contradictions between the twelve-fascicle Shōbōgenzō that emphasizes the former and the seventy-five-fascicle version that advocates the latter. Although hope is not central to Buddhist soteriology, this article shows that it is beneficial to analyze Buddhist teachings from the perspective of hope, for not only does it offer a new insight to the growing philosophical discourses on hope, but it also presents a way in which we can reconcile the contradictions within Dōgen’s various writings.
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 2327-0195
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,130
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Contextualized Self: Re-Placing Ourselves Through Dōgen and Spinoza.Gerard Kuperus - 2019 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 11 (3):222-234.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What May I Hope? Why It Can Be Rational to Rely on One’s Hope.Döring Sabine - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6 (3):117--129.
The Value of Hope.Luc Bovens - 1999 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3):667-681.
The Virtue of Hope.Adam Kadlac - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (2):337-354.
Moral Und Glück. Hoffnung Bei Kant Und Adorno.Tilo Wesche - 2012 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 60 (1):49-71.
The Logical Structure of Hope.Tian-qun Pan - 2013 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 13 (3):457-462.
Hope Against Hope.Terence Sweeney - 2016 - Philosophy and Theology 28 (1):165-184.
Rorty on Conversation as an Achievement of Hope. E. Cooke - 2004 - Contemporary Pragmatism 1 (1):83-102.
Rorty on Conversation as an Achievement of Hope.Elizabeth F. Cooke - 2004 - Contemporary Pragmatism 1 (1):83-102.
Social Hope and State Lawlessness.Norman Geras - 2008 - Critical Horizons 9 (1):90-98.
Hope as a Political Virtue.Darrel Moellendorf - 2006 - Philosophical Papers 35 (3):413-433.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-06-29

Total views
13 ( #769,201 of 2,506,501 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,244 of 2,506,501 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes