Authors
Jeremy William Dunham
Durham University
Abstract
Is there anything in the mind that was not first in the senses? According to the received view, the French empiricist Étienne Bonnot de Condillac’s answer to this was a firm “No”. Unlike Locke, who accepted the existence of innate faculties, Condillac rejected the existence of all innate structure and instinctive behaviours. Everything, therefore, is learned. In this article, I argue that from at least the writing of his 1754 Traité des sensations, this reading fails to capture the true nature of his philosophy of mind. I present a genetic reading of Condillac’s philosophy that shows that from the 1750s until his death in 1780, he developed, by engaging closely with the life sciences of his day, an increasingly sophisticated understanding of the mind and perception. This understanding depends on the acceptance of the activity of the mind, innate structure, and a moderate defence of instincts—all characteristics of the mind that he is most commonly read as rejecting. Reading Condillac in this genetic way demonstrates that his philosophy of mind is much more original and powerful than has previously been recognised.
Keywords Condillac   Empiricism   Innate Ideas   Vitalism   Philosophy of Mind
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.32881/jomp.11
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,908
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Search After Truth.Nicholas Malebranche, Thomas M. Lennon & Paul J. Olscamp - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (1):146-147.
An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.Peter H. Nidditch (ed.) - 1979 - Oxford University Press UK.
Epigenesis as Spinozism in Diderot’s Biological Project (Draft).Charles T. Wolfe - 2014 - In O. Nachtomy J. E. H. Smith (ed.), The Life Sciences in Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 181-201.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Locke on the Guise of the Good.Antonia LoLordo - 2021 - Philosophical Explorations 24 (1):21-33.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Condillac's Paradox.Lorne Falkenstein - 2005 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (4):403-435.
Condillac: Essay on the Origin of Human Knowledge.Hans Aarsleff (ed.) - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
Condillac: Essay on the Origin of Human Knowledge.Hans Aarsleff (ed.) - 2001 - Cambridge University Press.
Etienne Bonnot de Condillac.Christopher Gauker - 2017 - In Margaret Cameron, Benjamin Hill & Robert Stainton (eds.), Sourcebook in the History of Philosophy of Language. Switzerland: Springer. pp. 773-774.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-02-02

Total views
11 ( #848,266 of 2,497,768 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #283,405 of 2,497,768 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes