Fine-grained and Coarse-grained Knowledge in Euthydemus 293b7–d1

Australasian Philosophical Review 3 (2):198-205 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


ABSTRACT McCabe [2021: 137–40] identifies a crucial ambiguity in the terms ‘learns’ and ‘knows’. Such terms can be read as either ‘perfective’ or ‘imperfective’. This is an aspect difference. The former indicates a settled state, the latter a directed process. McCabe uses this insight to show how Socrates can rebut the sophists’ view of meaning, render compelling Socrates’ self-refutation arguments, and explain the Socratic connections between learning, knowledge, and how one should live. In the final section of the Euthydemus, Euthydemus offers the ‘Omniscience Sophism’, and the related, rather cheeky, ‘Father Sophisms’. McCabe [ibid.: 140–2] suggests that the Omniscience Sophism might be addressed by identifying an aspect ambiguity, but does not follow up her point in detail. In this response, I argue that McCabe’s instinct is good and that a relative term, such as ‘knowledgeable’, can be understood as having two senses. That distinction is between what I call ‘fine-grained’ and ‘coarse-grained’ senses of ‘knowledgeable’. I suggest that this distinction that tracks McCabe’s aspect distinction between senses of ‘learns’ and best explains the fallacy committed in the Omniscience Sophism.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,998

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Acquaintance Teaches.Alex Grzankowski & Michael Tye - 2019 - In Thomas Raleigh & Jonathan Knowles (eds.), Acquaintance: New Essays. Oxford University Press. pp. 75–94.
Granularity problems.Jens Christian Bjerring & Wolfgang Schwarz - 2017 - Philosophical Quarterly 67 (266):22-37.
On Theoretical and Practical Doxastic Attitudes.Tjerk Gauderis - 2014 - Logos and Episteme 5 (4):425-443.
What Counts as a ‘Good’ Metaphysical Language?J. T. M. Miller - 2021 - In James Miller (ed.), The Language of Ontology. Oxford University Press. pp. 102-118.
Information, Belief, and Possibility.Gerhard F. Nuffer - 2004 - Dissertation, University of Michigan
Conditional Belief and the Ramsey Test.Scott Sturgeon - 2002 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 51:215-232.
Some Problems with the Anti‐Luminosity‐Argument.Wim Vanrie - 2020 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 101 (3):538-559.
Categories and Comparisons of Artworks.H. J. Pratt - 2012 - British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (1):45-59.
Functionalism and propositions.John Martin Fischer - 1985 - Philosophical Studies 48 (November):295-311.
Causation, Transitivity, and Causal Relata.David Lynn Holt - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Research 15:263-277.
Causation, Transitivity, and Causal Relata.David Lynn Holt - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Research 15:263-277.
Fine-Grained Colour Discrimination without Fine-Grained Colour.Joshua Gert - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (3):602-605.


Added to PP

18 (#833,504)

6 months
7 (#431,507)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew Duncombe
Nottingham University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Commentary on Plato's Euthydemus.R. S. W. Hawtrey - 1981 - Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.

Add more references