Science & Education 28 (6-7):689-710 (2019)
AbstractControversies in science are an essential feature of scientific practice: defined here as current problems that are unresolved because there are no accepted procedures by which they can be resolved or there are differing assumptions that affect the interpretation of evidence. Although there has been much attention in science education literature addressing socio-scientific and historical controversies in science, less has been paid to the teaching of contemporary scientific controversies. Using semi-structured qualitative interviews with 18 teachers at different career stages in England, we investigated teachers’ social representations of scientific controversies using the discourse of the collective subject. We found a lack of controversy in teachers’ responses. Whilst scientific controversies were seen as an essential feature of how science works, they were not viewed as essential in science education and were represented as a distraction and dealt with informally, outside the planned curriculum and in response to students’ questions. Subject knowledge was considered a barrier. We argue that teaching about carefully selected scientific controversies has the potential to contribute to teachers’ and students’ understandings of science and the nature of science. There are perceived to be few opportunities for teachers to exercise this in the English context. We suggest how the collective subject discourses might be used to open up a discussion about teaching controversies in professional learning situations. Materials to stimulate discussion of scientific controversies could be useful in future curriculum development in science, but these would need to address the barriers of subject knowledge, access to literature and conflict with assessment-related priorities and a perceived need to advocate for trust in science.
Similar books and articles
Current Controversies in Values and Science.Kevin C. Elliott & Daniel Steel (eds.) - 2016 - Routledge.
Controversies and Epistemology.Marcelo Dascal - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:159-192.
Scientific Controversies in Teaching Science: The Case of Volta.Nahum Kipnis - 2001 - Science & Education 10 (1-2):33-49.
Current Controversies in Values and Science. [REVIEW]Vincenzo Politi - 2017 - Metapsychology Online Reviews 21 (42):xx-yy.
Critical Inquiry and Public Controversies.Public Controversies - 2009 - In Kendrick Frazier (ed.), Science Under Siege: Defending Science, Exposing Pseudoscience. Prometheus. pp. 89.
Controversies and Existence Claims in Chemistry: The Theory of Resonance.Hans P. W. Vermeeren - 1986 - Synthese 69 (3):273-290.
Science and Relativism: Some Key Controversies in the Philosophy of Science.Larry Laudan - 1990 - University of Chicago Press.
Science, Rhetoric, and the Sociology of Knowledge: A Critique of Dascal's View of Scientific Controversies.Kanavillil Rajagopalan - 2002 - Manuscrito 25 (2):433-464.
Current Controversies in Values and Science Ed. By Kevin C. Elliott, Daniel Steel.Inmaculada de Melo-Martín - 2019 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 29 (1):5-10.
Scientific Controversies. A Socio-Historical Perspective on the Advancement of Science.Dominique Raynaud - 2015 - Transaction Publishers.
Controversy as a Blind Spot in Teaching Nature of Science.Mario Kötter & Marcus Hammann - 2017 - Science & Education 26 (5):451-482.
Another Front in the Science Wars?[author unknown] - 2001 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (1):3-8.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society.Bruno Latour - 1987 - Harvard University Press.
Creating Scientific Controversies: Uncertainty and Bias in Science and Society.David Harker - 2015 - Cambridge University Press.
A Tale of Seven Scientists and a New Philosophy of Science.Eric R. Scerri - 2016 - Oxford University Press USA.
Teachers’ Ways of Talking About Nature of Science and Its Teaching.Malin Ideland, Andreas Redfors, Lena Hansson & Lotta Leden - 2015 - Science & Education 24 (9-10):1141-1172.