Is the abstract vs concrete distinction exhaustive & exclusive? Four reasons to be suspicious

Analytic Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is a widespread consensus within analytic metaphysics that the abstract versus concrete distinction, if valid at all, must be thought of as exhaustive and exclusive. I present four arguments designed to cast doubt on this consensus.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Composite Objects and the Abstract/Concrete Distinction.Daniel A. Kaufman - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:215-238.
Against the Abstract/Concrete Distinction.Susan Carol Hale - 1988 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The Way of Actuality.Sam Cowling - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (2):231-247.
Argument or Explanation: Who is to Decide?Michel Dufour - 2017 - Informal Logic 37 (1):23-41.
Mutually exclusive and exhaustive quantum states.James L. Park & William Band - 1976 - Foundations of Physics 6 (2):157-172.
Much Ado about Nothingness?Mohsen Moghri - 2020 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 34 (3):79-98.
On the Distinction between Abstract States, Concrete States, and Tropes.Friederike Moltmann - 2013 - In and Fabio Del Prete C. Beyssade /Alda Mari (ed.), Genericity. Oxford University Press. pp. 292-311.
Adorno, Hegel and the concrete universal.Charlotte Baumann - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (1):73-94.
Abstract and Concrete Individuals and Projection.Jiri Raclavsky - 2017 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 24 (supplementary):74-88.
Count Nouns and Mass Nouns.H. W. Noonan - 1978 - Analysis 38 (4):167-172.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-21

Downloads
30 (#517,657)

6 months
14 (#170,850)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Travis Dumsday
Concordia University of Edmonton

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A World of States of Affairs.D. Armstrong - 1993 - Philosophical Perspectives 7:429-440.
Necessary existents.Timothy Williamson - 2002 - In A. O'Hear (ed.), Logic, thought, and language. Cambridge University Press. pp. 233-251.
"Bare particulars".Theodore Sider - 2006 - Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):387–397.
Substance substantiated.C. B. Martin - 1980 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (1):3 – 10.

View all 27 references / Add more references