“We grew here you flew here”: claims to “home” in the Cronulla riots

Colloquy 16:210-228 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Fiona Allon writes that “ home, now more than ever, is seen as firmly connected to the world of politics and economics, as actively shaped and defined by the public sphere rather than existing simply as a refuge from it.” 1 From this perspective, claims to home as they are located in a relationship to claims of both national and local belonging are often a contested site within Australia, where notions of who is seen to be at home in Australia are constantly being challenged and reworked. Structured around the desire amongst white people to retain Australia as a “white nation,” claims to home may be seen as operating in complex ways in regards to the rights that arise from the ongoing existence of Indigenous sovereignties, and the politics surrounding levels of immigration from groups of people perceived as belonging to minority racial groups. In this context, the notion of home is frequently drawn upon in relation to both how people perceive the way in which they, and others, belong in a country, and this raises questions surrounding who is legitimately able to call Australia home. Such discourses of home evoke feelings of ownership in people who feel that they have a legitimate claim to a country for reasons primarily of race or location of birth. In Australia, despite the powerful presence and voice of Indigenous peoples, popular perceptions of the country tend to place such homely rights firmly in the laps of white people, who, through images of white nuclear families in front of white picket fences, perceive themselves as already and rightfully at home in Australia. Yet such conceptions of Australia are not accepted without struggle. Notions of home are very much contested, especially in terms of Indigenous sovereignty and non-white immigration, both of which question the legitimacy of a normatively white Australia. Such ideas of home as being a contested space in which issues of national belonging are played out in Australia were seen quite clearly in relation to the 2005 Cronulla riots, in which thousands of white Australians gathered around Cronulla beach, shouting at and threatening those located as “Lebanese Muslim” people. The people involved in the riots made it quite clear that whilst Australia was a home for them, it ought not to be home to people who were identified as Lebanese Muslims. Such racist opinions exemplified the fact that Australia is seen to be a white country, and therefore as a legitimate home to white people rather than to non-white minority groups or even to Indigenous Australians. This is discussed in more detail later in this paper

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A modified flew attack on the free will defense.Frank B. Dilley - 1982 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 20 (1):25-34.
Hume, flew, and the miraculous.R. C. Wallace - 1970 - Philosophical Quarterly 20 (80):230-243.
Flew's Moving Claims.Roger Squires - 1991 - Philosophy Now 2:16-16.
My 'conversion'.Antony Flew - 2005 - Think 4 (11):75-84.
Doctrine, justice, and home-sharing.J. Harris - 1999 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 19 (3):421-452.
My Pilgrimage from Atheism to Theism.Antony Flew & Gary Habermas - 2004 - Philosophia Christi 6 (2):197-211.
Pantomime riots.W. J. Slater - 1994 - Classical Antiquity 13 (1):120-144.
My Pilgrimage from Atheism to Theism.Antony Flew & Gary Habermas - 2004 - Philosophia Christi 6 (2):197-211.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
38 (#410,745)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references