Whewell, Necessity and The Inductive Sciences: A Philosophical-Systematic Survey

South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (4):333-358 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper Whewell’s concept of necessity is scrutinized and its historical development is outlined (ca. 1833-1860). Particular attention will be paid to how Whewell interpreted the laws of the inductive sciences as being necessary since the laws of nature are concretizations of the Fundamental Ideas which can be partially described by Axioms

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Discoverers' induction.Laura J. Snyder - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):580-604.
Review Essays: Whewell’s Philosophy under Dispute.Ron Curtis - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (3):495-506.
Whewell and mill on induction.Harold T. Walsh - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (3):279-284.
Quantitative realizations of philosophy of science: William Whewell and statistical methods.Kent Johnson - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (3):399-409.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
44 (#351,926)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

References found in this work

Butts on Whewell's view of true causes.David B. Wilson - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 40 (1):121-124.

Add more references