The Self-Emptying Subject: Kenosis and Immanence, Medieval to Modern

New York: Fordham University Press (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Against the two dominant ethical paradigms of continental philosophy–Emmanuel Levinas’s ethics of the other and Michel Foucault’s ethics of self-cultivation—The Self-Emptying Subject theorizes an ethics of self-emptying, or kenosis, one that reveals the immanence of an impersonal and dispossessed life without a why. Rather than align immanence with the enclosures of the subject, Dubilet engages the history of Christian mystical theology, modern philosophy, and contemporary theories of the subject to rethink immanence as what precedes and exceeds the very difference between the (human) self and the (divine) other, between the subject and transcendence. By arguing that transcendence operates on life in secular as well as religious domains, the book challenges a dominant distribution of concepts within contemporary theoretical discourse, which associates transcendence exclusively with religion and theology and immanence exclusively with modern secularity and philosophy. The Self-Emptying Subject argues that it is important to resist framing the relationship between medieval theology and modern philosophy as a transition from the affirmation of divine transcendence to the establishment of autonomous subjects. Through an engagement with Meister Eckhart, G. W. F. Hegel, and Georges Bataille, it uncovers a medieval theological discourse that rejects the primacy of pious subjects and the transcendence of God (Eckhart); retrieves a modern philosophical discourse that critiques the creation of self-standing subjects through a speculative rewriting of the concepts of Christian theology (Hegel); and explores a discursive site that demonstrates the subjecting effects of transcendence across theological and philosophical operations and archives (Bataille). Taken together, these interpretations suggest that if we suspend the antagonistic relationship between theological and philosophical discourses and decenter our periodizing assumptions and practices, we might encounter a yet unmapped theoretical fecundity of self-emptying that frees life from transcendent powers that incessantly subject it to their own ends.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Subjectivity: Ancient and Modern.R. J. Snell & Steven F. McGuire (eds.) - 2016 - Lanham: Lexington Books.
A kénosis da Trindade.Donizete José Xavier - 2007 - Revista de Cultura Teológica 59:43-63.
Freud and du Prel: Psychoanalysis, Magic, and Mediation.Jay Dee Everett - 1989 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook
Kierkegaard's kenotic Christology.David R. Law - 2013 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Medieval philosophy: an historical and philosophical introduction.John Marenbon - 2006 - New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-27

Downloads
22 (#669,532)

6 months
8 (#292,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alex Dubilet
Vanderbilt University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references