Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (1):37-66 (2005)
Abstract |
Some critics raise moral objections against corporate social responsibility on account of its supposedly undemocratic nature. Theyargue that it is hard to reconcile democracy with the private discretion that always accompanies the discharge of responsibilities that are not judicially enforceable. There are two ways of constructing this argument: the “perfect-market argument” and the “social-power argument.” This paper demonstrates that the perfect-market argument is untenable and that the social-power argument is sometimes valid. It also asserts that the proponents of the perfect-market argument are mistaken in their assumption that perfect markets are conducive to democracy. There are strong reasons to hold that perfect markets are undesirable from a democratic point of view. A proper conceptualization and differentiation of the relation between “the private and the public” can make this clear. The proponents of the social-power argument sometimes maintain that the democratic deficit can be compensated for by consulting the stakeholdersaffected. Against this, I will argue that the social power argument has nothing to offer affected parties. Still, it will be shown that moderntheory on corporate social responsibility is not well accommodated to the democratic deficit as revealed by the social power argument
|
Keywords | Applied Philosophy Business and Professional Ethics Social Science |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 1052-150X |
DOI | 10.5840/beq20051512 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality.Michael Walzer - 1983 - Philosophy 59 (229):413-415.
View all 21 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Board Gender Quotas: Exploring Ethical Tensions From A Multi-Theoretical Perspective.Siri Terjesen & Ruth Sealy - 2016 - Business Ethics Quarterly 26 (1):23-65.
Grounding Positive Duties in Commercial Life.Wim Dubbink & Luc Van Liedekerke - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 120 (4):527-539.
On the Duties of Commission in Commercial Life. A Kantian Criticism of Moral Institutionalism.Wim Dubbink & Bert van de Ven - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (2):221 - 238.
Similar books and articles
Communication as Commodity: Should the Media Be on the Market?Rutger Claassen - 2011 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (1):65-79.
Corporations, Profit Maximization and the Personal Sphere.Waheed Hussain - 2012 - Economics and Philosophy 28 (3):311-331.
Wittgenstein on Private Language and Privat Mental Objects.Dale Jacquette - 1994 - Wittgenstein-Studien 1 (1).
The Private Language Argument Isn't as Difficult, Nor as Dubious as Some Make Out.Roger Harris - 2007 - Sorites 18:98-108.
Is Democracy a Universal Value?: Whose Democracy?Karsten J. Struhl - 2007 - Radical Philosophy Today 5:3-24.
Governmental Power: Quality or Identity? Comment on Alon Harel's Argument Against Outsourcing Violence.Re'em Segev - 2011 - Law and Ethics of Human Rights 5 (2):416-423.
Is Market Society Intrinsically Repugnant?Jason Brennan - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 112 (2):271-281.
The Effects of “Going Private” on Corporate Financial and Corporate Social Performance.Marguerite Schneider & Alix Valenti - 2008 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:236-245.
Phenomenal Concepts are Consistent with Wittgenstein’s Private Language Argument.Francois-Igor Pris - 2014 - NB: Philosophical Investigations (Russian E-Journal) 7:64-98.
Rights as Democracy.Richard Bellamy - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (4):449-471.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2011-01-09
Total views
29 ( #394,550 of 2,506,918 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,155 of 2,506,918 )
2011-01-09
Total views
29 ( #394,550 of 2,506,918 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,155 of 2,506,918 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads