Book review: Janet Giltrow and Dieter Stein (eds), The Pragmatic Turn in Law: Inference and Interpretation in Legal Discourse [Book Review]

Discourse Studies 20 (5):688-690 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/1461445618786119

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The pragmatic turn in law: inference and interpretation in legal discourse.Janet Giltrow & Dieter Stein (eds.) - 2017 - Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Institutional Turn in Theories of Legal Interpretation.Bojan Spaić - 2019 - In David Duarte, Pedro Moniz Lopes & Jorge Silva Sampaio (eds.), Legal Interpretation and Scientific Knowledge. Springer Verlag. pp. 187-209.
Book review: Marcus Galdia, Legal Discourses. [REVIEW]Tatiana Dubrovskaya - 2016 - Discourse Studies 18 (2):235-237.
Book review: Dennis Kurzon and Barbara Kryk-Kastovsky (eds), Legal Pragmatics. [REVIEW]Tatiana Dubrovskaya - 2019 - Discourse Studies 21 (4):481-483.
A Computational Model for Generating and Interpreting Indirect Answers.Nancy Lee Green - 1994 - Dissertation, University of Delaware
Pragmatic connectives, argumentative coherence and relevance.Jacques Moeschler - 1989 - Argumentation 3 (3):321-339.
Cultural Dimensions Of Legal Discourse.Halina Sierocka - 2014 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 38 (1):189-196.
A Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context.Eveline T. Feteris - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (3):349-367.
Pragmatism and the pragmatic turn in cognitive science.Richard Menary - 2016 - In Karl Friston, Andreas Andreas & Danika Kragic (eds.), Pragmatism and the Pragmatic Turn in Cognitive Science. M.I.T. Press. pp. 219-236.
Pragmatic Maxims and Presumptions in Legal Interpretation.Fabrizio Macagno, Douglas Walton & Giovanni Sartor - 2018 - Law and Philosophy 37 (1):69-115.
Acts of the State and Representation in Edith Stein.Hamid Taieb - 2020 - Journal of Social Ontology 6 (1):21-45.
Law and interpretation: essays in legal philosophy.Andrei Marmor (ed.) - 1995 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Default Semantics: Foundations of a Compositional Theory of Acts of Communication.K. M. Jaszczolt - 2005 - Oxford University Press UK.
On Legal Inferentialism. Toward a Pragmatics of Semantic Content in Legal Interpretation?Giovanni Tuzet Damiano Canale - 2007 - Ratio Juris 20 (1):32-44.
On Legal Inferentialism. Toward a Pragmatics of Semantic Content in Legal Interpretation?Damiano Canale & Giovanni Tuzet - 2007 - Ratio Juris 20 (1):32-44.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-24

Downloads
7 (#1,351,854)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Legal discourses.Marcus Galdia - 2014 - New York: PL Academic Research.

Add more references