Abstract
Large prospective biobanks are being established containing DNA, lifestyle and health information in order to study the relationship between diseases, genes and environment. Informed consent is a central component of research ethics protection. Disclosure of information about the research is an essential element of seeking informed consent. Within biobanks, it is not possible at recruitment to describe in detail the information that will subsequently be collected because people will not know which disease they will develop. It will also be difficult to describe the specific research that will be performed using the biobank, other than to stipulate categories of research or diseases that are not included. Potential subjects can only be given information about the sorts of research that will be performed and by whom. Organisations responsible for biobanks usually argue that this disclosure of information is adequate when seeking informed consent, especially if coupled with a right to withdraw, as it would not be feasible or it would be too expensive to seek consent renewal on a regular basis. However, there are concerns about this ‘blanket consent’ approach’. Consent waivers have also been proposed in which research subjects entrust their consent with an independent third party to decide whether subsequent research using the biobank is consistent with the original consent provided by the subject
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsc.2006.06.007
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,740
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

How Can One Person Represent Another?A. Griffiths & Richard Wollheim - 1960 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 34:187-224.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

In Defense of Broad Consent.Gert Helgesson - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (1):40-50.
Biobanks--When is Re-Consent Necessary?K. S. Steinsbekk & B. Solberg - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):236-250.
The Human Genome Project.Lisa Gannett - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Biobanks--When is Re-Consent Necessary?K. S. Steinsbekk & B. Solberg - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):236-250.
Can Broad Consent Be Informed Consent?M. Sheehan - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):226-235.
Consent and Its Cousins.William A. Edmundson - 2011 - Ethics 121 (2):335-53.
Defining the Subject of Consent in DNA Research.Gordon R. Mitchell - 2001 - Journal of Medical Humanities 22 (1):41-53.
Informed Consent and Biobanks.Ellen Wright Clayton - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (1):15-21.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-30

Total views
33 ( #335,159 of 2,462,871 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,387 of 2,462,871 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes