AbstractA common method of improving how well understood a theory is, is by comparing it to another theory which has been better developed. Radical interpretation is a theory which attempts to explain how communication has meaning. Radical interpretation is treated as another time dependent theory and compared to the time dependent theory of biological evolution. Several similarities and differences are uncovered. Biological evolution can be gradual or punctuated. Whether radical interpretation is gradual or punctuated depends on how the question is framed: on the coarse-grained time scale it proceeds gradually, but on the fine-grained time scale it proceeds by punctuated equilibria. Biological evolution proceeds by natural selection, the counterpart to this is the increase in both correspondence and coherence. Exaption, mutations, and spandrels have counterparts metaphor, speech errors, and puns respectively. Homologous and analogs have direct counterparts in specific words. The most important differences originate from the existence of a unit of inheritance (the traditional gene) occurring in biological evolution - there is no such unit in language.
Similar books and articles
What is an Organism? An Immunological Answer.Thomas Pradeu - 2010 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 32 (2-3):247-267.
Biological Neuroscience is Only as Radical as the Evolution of Mind.Terry Blumenthal & James Schirillo - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):831-831.
Tempo and Mode in Evolution: Punctuated Equilibria and the Modern Synthetic Theory.Paul Thompson - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (3):432 - 452.
What is the Gene Trying to Do?Warren J. Ewens - 2011 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (1):155-176.
Cognition and Biological Evolution an Idealist Approach Resolves a Fundamental Paradox.Dr Axel Randrup - 2004
Beyond Evolution: Human Nature and the Limits of Evolutionary Explanation.Anthony O'Hear - 1997 - Oxford University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads