Good on paper: sociological critique, pragmatism, and secularization theory

Theory and Society 48 (2):325-350 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent years have seen numerous sociological disagreements devolve into heated debates, with scholars openly accusing their peers of being both empirically wrong and morally misguided. While social scientists routinely reflect on the ethical implications of certain research assumptions and data collection methods, the sociology of knowledge production has said little about how moral debates over scholarship shape subsequent research trajectories. Drawing on the new French pragmatic sociology, this article examines how sociologists respond to criticisms of the moral worth of their research. The article outlines three typical responses: (1) accepting the criticism and changing direction completely; (2) accepting the criticism but changing discursive framing to incorporate existing research without being subject to critique; and (3) navigating through the debate by devising new research directions that do not trigger such criticism. To demonstrate, the article looks at how sociologists of religion responded, in their published scholarship, to criticisms of secularization theory as depreciating religious people and spiritual experience. Across the responses, we show that sociologists have included moral considerations in their empirical investigations, and have switched among several diverse moral justifications to address—and also avoid—criticism. We conclude by demonstrating that this model can be extended to other domains of sociological inquiry, including the study of gender-based wage inequality and methodological nationalism. The article highlights the importance of mapping the moral frameworks sociologists use for the sociology of knowledge and the sociology of morality.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,346

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rawls and the Problem of Honour.Kevin W. Gray - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (2):213-222.
On the Subtleties of Reidian Pragmatism: A Reply to Magnus.Peter Baumann - 2004 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 2 (1):73-77.
A Critique of Rorty's Conception of Pragmatism.Richard Rorty - forthcoming - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy.
Secularizare/ desecularizare. Un rezumat de etapa/ Secularization/ De-Secularization.Marius Jucan - 2004 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 3 (7):192-203.
A Critique of Rorty’s Conception of Pragmatism.Paul Giladi - 2015 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 7 (2):168-185.
Pragmatism’s New Options.Joseph Margolis - 2006 - Contemporary Pragmatism 3 (1):1-14.
The Naturalistic Side of Hegel’s Pragmatism.Emmanuel Renault - 2012 - Critical Horizons 13 (2):244 - 274.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-02-19

Downloads
20 (#565,757)

6 months
4 (#184,255)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Work and play as moral categories.Shai M. Dromi - 2022 - Theory and Society 51 (6):893-906.

Add more citations