Author Reply: Is Cannon’s Theory (Only) a “Centralized” Version of James’s?

Emotion Review 6 (1):48-49 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this reply, I focus on the question of whether Cannon’s theory was a “centralized” version of James’s. Due to space limitations, I briefly present six observations that problematize this assertion. One of my guiding principles is that theories acquire their meaning within a particular context. From this historical perspective, and in their historical contexts, the theories were quite distinct.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kanian Freedom and the Problem of Luck.John Lemos - 2007 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (4):515-532.
Reply to Paul Guyer.Joseph Cannon - 2011 - Kantian Review 16 (1):135-139.
The Regress-Problem: A Reply to Vermazen.Carlos J. Moya - 1996 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 77 (2):155-161.
A Rebuttal of Nussbaum Laura Cannon.Laura Cannon - 2005 - In Barbara S. Andrew, Jean Clare Keller & Lisa H. Schwartzman (eds.), Feminist Interventions in Ethics and Politics: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 97.
Plato's 'Third Man' Arguments.F. R. Pickering - 1981 - Mind 90 (358):263-269.
Thin beats fat yet again – conceptions of democracy.James Allan - 2006 - Law and Philosophy 25 (5):533 - 559.
James and the early Laski: the ambiguous legacy of pragmatism.J.-A. C. Pemberton - 1998 - History of Political Thought 19 (2):264-292.
Emotions and some psychologists.B. R. Tilghman - 1965 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):63-69.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
27 (#576,320)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references