In Nietzsche on Time and History. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 1 (2008)

Manuel Dries
Open University (UK)
Why are we still intrigued by Nietzsche? This chapter argues that sustained interest stems from Nietzsche’s challenge to what we might call the ‘staticism’ inherent in our ordinary experience. Staticism can be defined, roughly speaking, as the view that the world is a collection of enduring, re-identifiable objects that change only very gradually and according to determinate laws. The chapter discusses Nietzsche’s rejection of remnants of staticism in Hegel and Schopenhauer (1). It outlines why Nietzsche deems belief in any variant of the staticist picture as problematic (2); and examines his adualistic-dialetheic stance towards, for example, first-person and third-person descriptions in the philosophy of mind (3). The chapter closes with a discussion of the contributions of "Nietzsche on Time and History".
Keywords Philosophical Nihilism  Philosophy of Mind  Friedrich Nietzsche
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
DOI 10.1515/9783110210460.0.1
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Nietzsche on Time and History.Manuel Dries (ed.) - 2008 - Walter de Gruyter.
Nietzsche’s Aesthetic Critique of Darwin.Charles H. Pence - 2011 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 33 (2):165-190.
On the Logic of Values.Manuel Dries - 2010 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 39 (1):30-50.
Nietzsche on Time and History (Review).Wolter Hartog - 2010 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 39 (1):89-92.


Added to PP index

Total views
1,829 ( #2,571 of 2,506,349 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
74 ( #10,768 of 2,506,349 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes